2-1 Treatments should be compared fairly

If a treatment is not compared to something else, it is not possible to know what would happen without the treatment, so it is difficult to attribute outcomes to the treatment.

Always ask what the comparisons are when considering claims about the effects of treatments. Claims that are not based on appropriate comparisons are not reliable.

Browse by Key Concept

Back to Learning Resources home

Filter these resources:

Clear Filters

Know Your Chances

This book has been shown in two randomized trials to improve peoples' understanding of risk in the context of health care choices.

13 | 0 Comments | Evaluated

Sunn Skepsis

Denne portalen er ment å gi deg som pasient råd om kvalitetskriterier for helseinformasjon og tilgang til forskningsbasert informasjon.

1 | 0 Comments

CEBM – Study Designs

A short article explaining the relative strengths and weaknesses of different types of study design for assessing treatment effects.

0 | 0 Comments

Psychiatric disorders

Regrettably, research is not always well done or relevant. Take the example of a distressing condition known as tardive dyskinesia. […]

0 | 0 Comments

Stroke

Stroke is a leading cause of death and long-term disability. The death rate is between one in six and two […]

0 | 0 Comments

In an ideal world

‘In an ideal world, wherever possible, we could be gathering anonymised outcome data and comparing this against medication history, making […]

0 | 0 Comments

Comparing like with like

In this sub-section Comparisons are key (this page) Treatments with dramatic effects Treatments with moderate but important effects Comparisons are […]

0 | 2 Comments

No Resources Found

Try clearing your filters or selecting different ones.