References (Chapter 13)
References for “Research for the right reasons: blueprint for a better future”
1 Chalmers 1, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 2009;374:86-89.
2 Roberts I, Yates D, Sandercock P, et al; CRASH trial collaborators. Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): randomised placebocontrolled trial. Lancet 2004;364:1321-8.
3 Cochrane Injuries Group Albumin Reviewers. Human albumin administration in critically ill patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1998;317:235-40.
4 Finfer S, Bellomo R, Bryce N, et al (SAFE Study Investigators). A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. New England Journal of Medicine 2004;350:2247-56.
5 Edwards A, Elwyn G, Atwell C, et al. Shared decision making and risk communication in general practice – a study incorporating systematic literature reviews, psychometric evaluation of outcome measures, and quantitative, qualitative and health economic analyses of a cluster randomised trial of professional skill development. Report to Health in Partnership programme, UK Department of Health. Cardiff: Department of General Practice. University of Wales College of Medicine, 2002.
6 Farrell C, ed. Patient and public involvement in health: The evidence for policy implementation. A summary of the results of the Health in Partnership research programme. London: Department of Health Publications, April 2004. Accessed 18th January 2012.
7 Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M, et al for the ProtecT Study Group. Quality improvement report: improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. BMJ 2002;325:766-70.
8 Dickersin K, Chalmers I. Recognising, investigating and dealing with incomplete and biased reporting of clinical research: from Francis Bacon to the World Health Organization. James Lind Library, 2010. Accessed 18th January 2012.
9 Chan A-W, Hrόbjartsson A, Haahr MT, et al. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 2004;291:2457-65.
10 Chan AW, Altman DG. Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals. Lancet 2005;365:1159-62.
11 Glasziou P, Meats E, Heneghan C, Shepperd S. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? BMJ 2008;336:1472-4.
12 Clarke M, Hopewell S, Chalmers I. Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting. Lancet 2010;376:20-21.
GET-IT Jargon Buster
GET-IT provides plain language definitions of health research terms